Impact of Evidence-Based Approaches on Treatment Implementation: Summary for Physicians
Infusion Hesitancy with High-Risk Agents
- Data from the SKIPPirr trial have significantly reduced physician hesitancy in prescribing amivantamab
- Enhanced premedication protocols have improved confidence among infusion nurses
- Institutions continue to block 8-hour appointments for cycle 1 day 1 and day 2 amivantamab patients
- Well-informed health care teams are better equipped to manage potential reactions
Oral vs IV Therapy Considerations
Oral Therapy Advantages
- Provides greater patient autonomy and sense of control
- Reduces frequency of clinical visits
- May improve quality of life by eliminating infusion appointments
Oral Therapy Challenges
- Reduced adherence in patients with limited social support or lower health literacy
- Less frequent monitoring may delay identification and management of adverse effects
- Patient hesitancy to report symptoms between visits can impact treatment efficacy
IV Therapy Considerations
- Regular clinic visits ensure consistent monitoring and adherence
- Travel burden for frequent appointments may decrease quality of life
- More immediate opportunity to address emerging adverse effects
Clinical Approach
- Treatment selection should involve thoughtful discussion about individual patient circumstances
- Assess potential barriers to adherence for both oral and IV options
- Consider patient preferences, distance to treatment center, and support systems
- Balance efficacy considerations with anticipated impact on quality of life
The ideal treatment approach requires individualizing therapy based on both clinical factors and patient-specific considerations.