
Opinion|Videos|November 1, 2024
SC vs IV Administration Methods
Key Takeaways
- Subcutaneous administration reduces healthcare resource utilization by minimizing administration time and facility requirements.
- Patient convenience with subcutaneous administration can enhance treatment adherence, particularly in chronic conditions.
Panelists discuss how subcutaneous (SC) administration of drugs like daratumumab offers advantages over intravenous (IV) administration in terms of reduced health care resource utilization, improved patient convenience, and potentially better treatment adherence, while also considering potential drawbacks such as injection site reactions and the need for proper training in SC administration techniques.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
- Discuss the pros and cons of subcutaneous compared with intravenous administration in terms of health care resource utilization, patient populations, and treatment adherence.
Newsletter
Stay informed on drug updates, treatment guidelines, and pharmacy practice trends—subscribe to Pharmacy Times for weekly clinical insights.
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Pharmacy Times
1
Key Data, Interviews at the 2025 ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition
2
Guiding Patients With Sickle Cell Disease Through the Transformative Era of Gene Therapy
3
New Data Highlights Pharmacists’ Expanding Roles in Hematologic Malignancies
4
Bridging Response Emerges as Key Predictor of Cilta-Cel Outcomes in CARTITUDE-4
5

















































































































































































































