
Opinion|Videos|May 27, 2025
Patient Education for LDL-C–Lowering Therapies
Panelists discuss how patient education should emphasize the importance of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) management, the benefits and risks of therapy intensification, and how clinicians can navigate the expanding range of LDL-C–lowering agents by considering patient-specific factors such as cardiovascular risk, prior treatments, and cost-effectiveness.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Optimizing LDL-C Management: A Summary for Physicians
Patient Education Key Points
- Emphasize LDL-C level as a primary modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and the relationship between lower LDL-C levels and improved outcomes
- Explain the incremental cardiovascular benefit of progressive LDL-C reduction below traditional target levels
- Present treatment options in a risk-benefit framework that includes proven mortality/morbidity benefits vs potential adverse effects
- Address common misconceptions about statin therapy and other lipid-lowering medications
- Use visual aids and simplified risk calculators to improve patient understanding of their personal cardiovascular risk
- Discuss lifestyle modifications as foundational therapy that enhances medication effectiveness
Treatment Selection Strategies
- Implement a stepwise approach starting with high-intensity statins as first-line therapy
- Consider nonstatin therapies (e.g., ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors, and bempedoic acid) based on:
- Residual risk after maximum-tolerated statin therapy
- Baseline risk profile (prioritizing highest-risk patients for combination therapy)
- Prior medication tolerance and response
- Cost-effectiveness and insurance coverage constraints
- Personalize treatment intensity based on individual risk factors, comorbidities, and LDL-C reduction target levels
- Establish clear thresholds for therapy intensification based on risk stratification
- Develop institution-specific protocols that incorporate cost considerations and local formulary constraints
- Consider patient preferences and medication adherence factors in therapy selection
Advertisement
Related to this article

Phase 3 Krascendo 1 results suggest investigational divarasib could improve survival compared with currently approved KRAS G12C inhibitors in previously treated NSCLC.

This study found that use of fixed-dose 4F-PCC is a safe, efficient alternative to weight-based dosing and can lead to cost savings for the health system.

Tucatinib’s new HER2-positive breast cancer maintenance indication extends disease control while requiring close liver monitoring and pharmacist coordination of oral therapy with ongoing antibody treatment.

Pharmacy professionals can leverage LinkedIn to build a professional brand, expand meaningful connections, share expertise, and create opportunities for career growth.

An Italian pharmacy student offers an inside look at pharmacy education in Italy, from admission and coursework to oral exams and professional training.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Pharmacy Times
1
VAX-31 Meets All Primary End Points vs PCV20 and PCV21 in Pivotal Phase 3 OPUS-1 Trial
2
Peptide Compounding Is Evolving: What Pharmacists Need to Know Now
3
Could Divarasib Challenge Existing KRAS G12C Inhibitors in Lung Cancer?
4
Pharmacists Positioned as Key Educators as Monoclonal Antibodies Emerge as COVID-19 Immunization Option
5




