Individuals in a negative mood spend more time viewing the social media profiles of unsuccessful peers.
When feeling down, individuals may be more likely to view the social media profiles of those in worse situations, the results of a recent study suggest.
The study, which will appear in the December 2014 issue of Computers in Human Behavior, analyzed how individuals use social media to manage their mood. For the analysis, 168 college students completed facial emotion recognition tests. Afterward, the authors of the study randomly induced positive or negative moods among the students by praising or criticizing their performance on the test, regardless of their actual scores.
The students were then asked to review a new social networking site, which included the profile pages of 8 fictitious individuals. Each profile included ratings based on the individual’s career success and attractiveness. Half of the profiles had high careers and attractiveness ratings, while the other half had low ratings. Because the students could not view photos of the individuals or any information that would reveal actual career or academic success, physical appearance, or romantic relationships, the only real differentiating factors between the profiles were the ratings.
Overall, the students tended to spend more time viewing the profile pages of those who were rated as successful and attractive. However, students who had been induced into a negative mood spent significantly more time viewing the profiles of those rated unsuccessful and unattractive.
“If you need a self-esteem boost, you’re going to look at people worse off than you,” said study co-author Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick, PhD, MA, in a press release. “You’re probably not going to be looking at the people who just got a great new job or just got married. One of the great appeals of social network sites is that they allow people to manage their moods by choosing who they want to compare themselves to.”
Social Media Users Turn to Unsuccessful Peer Profiles for Self-Esteem Boost
Individuals in a negative mood spend more time viewing the social media profiles of unsuccessful peers.
Individuals in a negative mood spend more time viewing the social media profiles of unsuccessful peers.
When feeling down, individuals may be more likely to view the social media profiles of those in worse situations, the results of a recent study suggest.
The study, which will appear in the December 2014 issue of Computers in Human Behavior, analyzed how individuals use social media to manage their mood. For the analysis, 168 college students completed facial emotion recognition tests. Afterward, the authors of the study randomly induced positive or negative moods among the students by praising or criticizing their performance on the test, regardless of their actual scores.
The students were then asked to review a new social networking site, which included the profile pages of 8 fictitious individuals. Each profile included ratings based on the individual’s career success and attractiveness. Half of the profiles had high careers and attractiveness ratings, while the other half had low ratings. Because the students could not view photos of the individuals or any information that would reveal actual career or academic success, physical appearance, or romantic relationships, the only real differentiating factors between the profiles were the ratings.
Overall, the students tended to spend more time viewing the profile pages of those who were rated as successful and attractive. However, students who had been induced into a negative mood spent significantly more time viewing the profiles of those rated unsuccessful and unattractive.
“If you need a self-esteem boost, you’re going to look at people worse off than you,” said study co-author Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick, PhD, MA, in a press release. “You’re probably not going to be looking at the people who just got a great new job or just got married. One of the great appeals of social network sites is that they allow people to manage their moods by choosing who they want to compare themselves to.”
From Setbacks to Solutions: Pioneering Safe RSV Vaccines for Infants, Children
Public Health Matters - A Conversation for Sexual Health Awareness Month
Pharmacists Pet Peeves: September 2023
Pharmacy Focus: Student Edition - Fostering Inclusivity: Scholarships for Black Student Pharmacists
Researchers Compare PrEP Treatments for Hypertension Risks
Report: Gen Z Knows Least About HIV Compared to Older Generations
From Setbacks to Solutions: Pioneering Safe RSV Vaccines for Infants, Children
Public Health Matters - A Conversation for Sexual Health Awareness Month
Pharmacists Pet Peeves: September 2023
Pharmacy Focus: Student Edition - Fostering Inclusivity: Scholarships for Black Student Pharmacists
Researchers Compare PrEP Treatments for Hypertension Risks
Report: Gen Z Knows Least About HIV Compared to Older Generations
From Setbacks to Solutions: Pioneering Safe RSV Vaccines for Infants, Children
Public Health Matters - A Conversation for Sexual Health Awareness Month
Pharmacists Pet Peeves: September 2023
Pharmacy Focus: Student Edition - Fostering Inclusivity: Scholarships for Black Student Pharmacists
Researchers Compare PrEP Treatments for Hypertension Risks
Report: Gen Z Knows Least About HIV Compared to Older Generations
From Setbacks to Solutions: Pioneering Safe RSV Vaccines for Infants, Children
September 21st 2023Public Health Matters - A Conversation for Sexual Health Awareness Month
September 21st 2023Pharmacists Pet Peeves: September 2023
September 21st 2023Pharmacy Focus: Student Edition - Fostering Inclusivity: Scholarships for Black Student Pharmacists
September 18th 2023Researchers Compare PrEP Treatments for Hypertension Risks
September 20th 2023Report: Gen Z Knows Least About HIV Compared to Older Generations
September 20th 2023