Article
The Generic Pharmaceutical Association and America's Health Insurance Plans jointly filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in the Supreme Court case Cuozzo v. Lee.
PRESS RELEASE
Washington, DC - The Generic Pharmaceutical Association (GPhA) and America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) jointly filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in the Supreme Court case Cuozzo v. Lee, addressing the critical role of the inter partes review (IPR) process in promoting a competitive, affordable prescription drug market for consumers.
The IPR process is an important consumer protection against abusive patent extensions. It plays a vital role in quickly, efficiently and accurately clearing the system of weak patents -- including those that artificially prolong drug exclusivity provisions in order to delay competition from generics. The IPR holds great promise in reducing anticompetitive "evergreening" practices that drive up health care costs for consumers.
As branded specialty drug costs continue to increase and outpace overall health care cost growth, any attempt to weaken a viable, administrative process that helps expedite patient access to more affordable medicines should be rejected.
“It is critical that any changes to current law avoid reducing or delaying patient access to more affordable generic drugs and biosimilars,” said Chip Davis, President and CEO, GPhA.
As many healthcare stakeholders note, including branded drug companies, generic drugs drive savings, not costs in our healthcare system. Branded drug company efforts to delay generic entry and block competition and extend patent life only drive up drug costs and jeopardize patient access to treatments. These tactics run counter to the goals of promoting a viable and competitive health care market for consumers, small and large businesses, and taxpayers.
"Consumers and the health system as a whole benefit from a more competitive prescription drug market," AHIP President and CEO Marilyn Tavenner said. "Weakening the IPR process, and in turn, protecting monopoly-like pricing schemes threaten consumers' access to more affordable prescription medications."