Saseen emphasized that many patients remain on suboptimal statin doses because initial prescribing decisions often persist indefinitely, despite evidence-based guideline recommendations for higher-intensity therapy in high- and very high-risk patients. He noted that although both gradual titration and initiating therapy at target intensity are acceptable approaches, limited health system resources and inconsistent follow-up often delay low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment.
Key Takeaways
- High- and very high-risk patients often require high-intensity statins upfront to achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C reductions.
- Combination therapy with nonstatin agents can help maintain treatment intensity when statin tolerability is a concern.
- Adherence should be actively assessed using patient conversations, refill data, and LDL-C response—not assumed.
From a pharmacist perspective, Saseen advocated for initiating high-intensity statin therapy when clinically indicated rather than prolonging care with inadequate dosing. He explained that patients requiring a 50% or greater LDL-C reduction are unlikely to achieve that goal with moderate-intensity statins alone, and delays in optimization may increase cardiovascular risk. When tolerability concerns arise, pharmacists should be prepared to pivot strategies, including dose adjustments or combination therapy with nonstatin agents such as ezetimibe (Zetia; Merck & Co), to maintain therapeutic intensity.
Saseen also highlighted the importance of pharmacist-led shared decision-making, particularly when balancing efficacy, safety, and patient preferences. He encouraged pharmacists to adopt a more proactive approach to dyslipidemia management, similar to hypertension treatment models, where initiating combination therapy may be appropriate for select patients.
The worst thing we can do is identify a patient that needs a 50-plus percent reduction in LDL-C and give them a low- or moderate-intensity regimen. - Joe Saseen, PharmD, BCPS, BCACP, CLS
Regarding adherence, Saseen stressed that effective communication is foundational. Pharmacists must tailor education to patients’ health literacy levels and clearly explain the preventive nature of lipid-lowering therapy, particularly for asymptomatic conditions. He underscored the value of trustworthy educational resources and objective adherence assessments, including refill data and LDL-C response, to identify gaps in therapy engagement. Ultimately, Saseen positioned pharmacists as essential drivers of both appropriate statin intensification and sustained adherence in cardiovascular risk reduction.
Watch part 1 and part 2 of Saseen’s insights.