National Association of Specialty Pharmacy urges PBMs to engage in dialogue about limiting medication costs for seniors.
Yesterday, the National Association of Specialty Pharmacy (NASP) launched StopDIRfees.com, which is a site that underscores how direct and indirect remuneration (DIR) fees affect independent pharmacies—especially those in the specialty space—and Medicare patients.
DIR fees have been said to increase drug costs for seniors insured through Medicare Part D, while also threatening the profitability of specialty pharmacies who provide treatment to patients with complex diseases.
“Big pharmacy benefit management (PBMs) firms have worked hard to make DIR fees so complicated and opaque that very few people understand how they impact sick seniors enrolled in Medicare,” Sheila Arquette, executive director of NASP, said in a press release.
NASP has previously spoken out about the harms of DIR fees and how these actions can result in poor patient outcomes and cause pharmacies to close their doors.
The Pharmaceutical Care Management Association disagrees, however, stating that DIR fees reduce premiums for Medicare Part D beneficiaries, which they state leads to lower costs for the federal government.
“DIR fees endanger the integrity of the Medicare Part D program, which is intended to ensure quality, satisfaction, and cost effectiveness for sick seniors across the nation. While debates continue over runaway prescription drug prices from Capitol Hill to local town halls, sick and vulnerable seniors are increasingly shouldering the brunt of DIR fees, which erode access to the vital clinical and patient support services required of such breakthrough specialty medications,” Arquette said. “StopDIRfees.com exposes how these dangerous and misaligned fees threaten both seniors’ pocketbooks and our entire healthcare system.”
Earlier this year, the Community Oncology Alliance commissioned a white paper that outlined how PBMs changed the meaning of DIR fees to benefit their businesses. DIR fees cut profits for pharmacies and raise co-payments for seniors, which drives them to reach catastrophic coverage sooner than necessary, according to the report.
StopDIRfees.com features materials and resources to educate patients, providers, legislators, government administrators, industry analysts, media, and taxpayers about DIR fees, according to the release.
The website also includes information and testimonials to put a spotlight on PBMs who impose DIR fees to gain profits, according to NASP. Additionally, StopDIRfees.com includes a petition and contact information to urge individuals to raise the issue with their elected officials to put a stop to DIR fees.
“Big PBMs risk putting profits over patients, and squeezing out the specialty pharmacies working as an extension of physicians treating sick seniors as they manage complex, life-altering, or life-threatening diseases,” Shanahan said. “It’s time for Washington to take action by requiring PBMs to stop DIR fees and enhance transparency by opening up their ‘black box’ of information. We need big PBMs to engage in an open and honest discussion around containing prescription medication costs for sick seniors, and work with specialty pharmacies to establish standards and incentives that apply to the unique services provided or patients treated by specialty pharmacies.”