
Simple Blood Test May Predict Early Death Risk in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Key Takeaways
- Early adverse outcomes were common with intensive induction: 27.8% of patients required ICU admission, and 12% died within 3 months of diagnosis.
- High log2-EASIX (≥3.53) stratified markedly higher risk: 3‑month mortality, 32.5% vs 5.1%; and ICU admission, 50% vs 19.6%.
Emerging data regarding newly diagnosed AML found that the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index independently predicts early mortality and ICU admission during intensive induction chemotherapy.
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a high-risk hematologic malignancy linked to significant early mortality despite many advances in supportive care and induction strategies.1 Early death is an ongoing critical challenge in patients with AML who are undergoing intensive chemotherapy, with most events taking place within the first 30 to 90 days following diagnosis.2
While risk stratification tools such as the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) classification provide prognostic insight, these models are primarily designed to predict long-term outcomes and may not adequately capture the risk of early clinical deterioration during induction therapy.3,4
Finotto et al evaluated whether Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) scores could serve as a rapid predictor of early mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission in patients with newly diagnosed AML undergoing intensive induction therapy.1
AML and the Need for Early Risk Prediction
AML is recognized through its rapid proliferation of immature myeloid blasts, causing bone marrow failure, cytopenias, and life-threatening complications.1 Despite advances in induction therapy, early mortality remains a significant concern, driven by patient frailty, disease burden, and disparities in care.2,4
Patients with AML in a critical state require frequent ICU-level care, with prior data showing high rates of organ dysfunction and mortality upon being admitted.5 Traditional prognostic models such as comorbidity-based indices and genetic classification systems are not designed to capture acute physiologic instability at presentation.6,7 This gap limits the early identification of patients at the highest risk of clinical deterioration during induction chemotherapy.
The EASIX Score: A Simple Biomarker of Physiologic Stress
EASIX was initially formulated as a surrogate marker of endothelial injury in hematologic malignancies and transplant populations. It is calculated using routinely available laboratory values: lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) multiplied by creatinine, then divided by platelet count. This composite expresses multiple biological processes associated with AML, including tumor burden (LDH elevation), renal dysfunction or tumor lysis (creatinine), and bone marrow failure (thrombocytopenia).8,9
Though it was primarily developed as a marker of endothelial activation, EASIX can also reflect broader systemic physiologic stress in acutely ill patients.10,11 Prior data has demonstrated its predictive value for complications including sepsis, thrombotic microangiopathy, and mortality in hematologic populations.9-11
Study Design
The researchers analyzed data from 158 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML being treated with intensive induction chemotherapy (7 + 3 regimen) at a tertiary care center. Patients who were receiving palliative or low-intensity therapy were excluded. The EASIX score was calculated on day 1 of treatment initiation. Patients were stratified into risk groups based on the upper quartile (log2-EASIX ≥ 3.53). The outcomes included ICU admission and all-cause mortality within 3 months of diagnosis.3
Key Findings
Among the 158 participants, 27.8% required ICU admission, with 12% facing mortality within 3 months. High EASIX scores were significantly associated with poor early outcomes in multivariate analysis1:
- 3-month mortality rate: 32.5% (high EASIX) vs 5.1% (low EASIX)
- ICU admission rate: 50% (high EASIX) vs 19.6% (low EASIX)
In a multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex, C-reactive protein, ECOG performance status, and ELN risk classification, a high EASIX score was an independent predictor of 3-month mortality (OR, 6.60 [95% CI, 1.93-22.50]) and ICU admission (OR, 4.05 [95% CI, 1.63-10.05]). Predictive performance was moderate to strong, with an area under the curve of about 0.75 for 3-month mortality and 0.64 for ICU admission.1
Clinical Implications
These findings suggest that EASIX scores may serve as a rapid, inexpensive tool for risk stratification at the time of AML diagnosis. The EASIX score identifies patients at risk of early physiologic collapse during induction therapy, unlike genetic risk models that guide long-term prognosis.
Patients with high EASIX scores may represent a subgroup with increased physiologic vulnerability who could benefit from consideration of lower-intensity treatment strategies, such as venetoclax-based combinations, rather than standard intensive induction.
Pharmacists can support the early identification of high-risk patients by facilitating timely EASIX calculation at diagnosis and flagging results that may warrant escalated monitoring for tumor lysis syndrome, infection, and renal dysfunction, or prompt consideration of treatment modification.































































































































