
From Trial to Practice: Key Findings from the SKYLIGHT and OASIS Studies
Phase 3 SKYLIGHT and OASIS trials show rapid, week-one relief of menopausal hot flashes, with key safety findings and mixed sleep benefits.
Episodes in this series

In 'From Trial to Practice: Key Findings from the SKYLIGHT and OASIS Studies,' our panel of experts delve into the following critical questions:
- The SKYLIGHT and OASIS trials aimed to study the safety and efficacy of fezolinetant and elinzanetant, respectively. What were the primary and secondary endpoints of these studies?
- How quickly did patients in the trials see symptom improvement?
- What did each study report in terms of sleep disturbance improvements?
Led by the moderator, the panelists discussed the design and key findings of the SKYLIGHT 1 and 2 trials for fezolinetant and the OASIS 1, 2, and 3 trials for elinzanetant, noting that both sets of trials shared a similar Phase III framework requiring replicated results across independent sites, with primary endpoints focused on reductions in the frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms from baseline at weeks 4 and 12. The discussion highlighted a particularly compelling efficacy finding shared across both agents, that participants in the trials began reporting meaningful symptom improvement as early as week one, with post-hoc analyses of SKYLIGHT data suggesting some patients experienced relief as early as day one, a notably faster onset than the several weeks typically required for hormone therapy to produce results. The panelists also examined sleep as a secondary endpoint across both trial programs, noting that fezolinetant demonstrated limited statistically significant sleep benefit in the SKYLIGHT trials, whereas elinzanetant's dual NK1 and NK3 mechanism positioned sleep improvement as a more prominent outcome, with the ongoing NIRVANA trial specifically designed to objectively measure sleep changes using polysomnography rather than self-reporting, representing an important step toward rigorous, evidence-based understanding of this benefit.
Throughout the conversation, the experts provide a comprehensive reflection on the field and the factors that may shape how clinicians approach care moving forward.
Our next episode, 'From Trial Data to Real-World Practice: Safety, Monitoring, and Patient Selection for VMS Treatment,' further explores vasomotor symptoms and menopause, highlighting the most common adverse events reported in the trials of each agent, how long-term safety data inform clinical confidence in these therapies, and which patient profiles are best suited for fezolinetant versus elinzanetant in real-world practice.












































































































