At the events, participants were asked to complete an initial Likert scale presurvey, assessing their health literacy and comfort level surrounding opioid and naloxone use. Participants were provided layperson naloxone administration training and education led by pharmacy learners and pharmacists, along with patient education handouts and brochures. After training, participants were asked to complete the same Likert scale survey. The surveys were anonymous and collected at the time services were offered, and there was no patient follow-up.
The Table lists the 10 statements provided on the pre- and postsurveys. For each question/statement, participants were expected to identify whether they strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, or strongly disagree. Presurvey and postsurvey results were compared to assess improvement in participant health literacy after receiving layperson naloxone training and patient education. Participants were provided with informed consent and could opt out of the training at any time.
Results
The results of the surveys show significant improvement in overdose knowledge and confidence in the administration of naloxone. Before the training, 45% of the survey participants overall agreed that they had sufficient knowledge regarding responding to opioid overdoses, while 55% disagreed or strongly disagreed. After the training, 97% of the participants agreed overall that they had gained sufficient knowledge regarding responding to opioid overdoses, while only 3% disagreed or strongly disagreed. Confidence in helping others who may be experiencing an opioid overdose and feeling sufficiently informed to administer naloxone safely also increased after the training (15%-92% and 25%-98%, respectively). Overall, the training was associated with significant improvement in overdose knowledge and confidence for opioid overdose recognition, response, and naloxone safety and efficacy.
Discussion
About the Authors
Amy Renaud, PharmD, TTS, is an assistant professor of pharmacy practice at Florida A&M University (FAMU)’s College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Institute of Public Health in Crestview, Florida.
Madison Holmes, PharmD, BCPS, is an associate professor of pharmacy practice at FAMU’s College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Institute of Public Health.
Chenita Carter, PharmD, MS, is an associate professor of pharmacy practice and division director at FAMU’s College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Institute of Public Health.
Alexis Henry, Noor Alkinoon, Daniel Freeman, and Bryan McCarthy, are 2026 PharmD candidates at FAMU’s College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Institute of Public Health.
The naloxone education training yielded significant improvements in participant knowledge and self-sufficiency related to overdose recognition and naloxone administration. These findings are consistent with prior studies showing that patient education plus health literacy interventions instill confidence and provide knowledge in response to emergency situations.4-7 This study shows that pharmacist-led education can improve overall health literacy surrounding naloxone use in underserved populations. The ability to provide medication-based knowledge in patient-friendly language, the accessibility of care to patients, and reliable health care information position pharmacists and pharmacy learners as valuable members of the health care team in both community and professional settings.
The overall improvement in confidence and public education among study participants emphasizes the potential to use pharmacists and pharmacy learners as naloxone training educators in other areas, including community pharmacies, ambulatory care clinics, and academic institutions. An example of this could be incorporating naloxone overdose education into an advanced or introductory pharmacy practice experience for a pharmacy learner to deliver community-based training events as a community service activity under the supervision of a pharmacy preceptor. Another example could be utilizing pharmacy learners to provide naloxone education at an ambulatory care clinic visit, either during the patient’s appointment or in the waiting room.
Strengths of this study include a clear pre- and postsurvey study design, a focus on practical skills relevant to the participants, and high survey completion rates. Limitations include a small sample size, the loss of data from 2 individuals who did not complete the postsurvey, possible self-report bias, and a lack of information about long-term knowledge retention or successful naloxone administration reports outside the initial training, such as an additional knowledge assessment or some kind of actual naloxone use post training assessment. Despite the limitations, the overall improvement adds to the intervention’s educational value. Future research could include a larger sample size, a more diverse group of participants, and further follow-up to assess long-term knowledge retention and the application of newly developed skills in the real world. Adding qualitative feedback and culturally appropriate outreach could further boost engagement and overall long-term impact.
Conclusion
Educating the audience about naloxone has improved knowledge, confidence in usage, and readiness for an opioid overdose. The posttraining survey demonstrated participants’ better understanding of the signs of an opioid-induced overdose, knowing where to acquire naloxone, and knowing how to administer it. By building from existing evidence supporting educational interventions, the findings show the pharmacy team's impacts on improving health literacy and preventing opioid overdoses in underserved communities.1-3 They are effective at harm-reduction strategies and implementing effective community health literacy. Achieving more educational events through community pharmacies and academic partnerships will fortify overdose prevention awareness in high-risk populations.
REFERENCES
Mack KA, Jones CM, Ballesteros MF. Illicit drug use, illicit drug use disorders, and drug overdose deaths in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas — United States. MMWR Surveill Summ 2017;66(19):1-12. doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss6619a1
Nutbeam D, Lloyd JE. Understanding and responding to health literacy as a social determinant of Health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2021;42:159-173. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102529
Wittink H, Oosterhaven J. Patient education and health literacy. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018;38:120-127. doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2018.06.004
Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(2):97-107. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005
Office of the Surgeon General (US); Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US). Proceedings of the Surgeon General's Workshop on Improving Health Literacy. National Institutes of Health; 2006. Accessed August 29, 2025. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK44260/