
Ranibizumab Biosimilar Demonstrates Noninferiority to Innovator Counterpart Treating Myopic CNVM
Key Takeaways
- Razumab demonstrated noninferior outcomes to Lucentis in treating mCNVM, supporting its cost-effective adoption.
- Both innovator and biosimilar groups showed significant improvements in BCVA and CMT, with stable IOP.
Razumab, a ranibizumab biosimilar, shows comparable efficacy to its innovator counterpart in treating myopic choroidal neovascular membrane (mCNVM), offering a cost-effective solution.
A ranibizumab biosimilar, Razumab (Intas Pharmaceuticals), demonstrated noninferior visual and anatomical outcomes compared with its innovator counterpart (Lucentis, Accentrix; Genentech, Novartis) when treating patients with myopic choroidal neovascular membrane (mCNVM), according to clinical findings published in Clinical Ophthalmology.
The findings show support for payer adoption of the biosimilar as a cost-effective, high-quality alternative, especially for patients hindered by high costs or restricted resources.1
mCNVM is a condition that can occur in patients with any degree of myopia, even in the absence of characteristic degenerative retinal changes. It is reported to affect about 5% to 11% of patients with pathologic myopia, and among these patients, about 62% developed the condition before 50 years of age. A diagnosis is considered for a middle-aged myope who presents with sudden vision loss, metamorphopsia, and typical funduscopic changes. Diagnosis in elderly patients is often more challenging because other conditions that can lead to CNV—such as age-related macular degeneration—may also be present.2
Regarding treatment, ranibizumab is an FDA-approved anti-VEGF agent indicated for mCNVM. Bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech) and aflibercept (Eylea; Regeneron) are also used off-label, and for those contraindicated for anti-VEGF treatments, verteporfin photodynamic therapy may be considered.2
For this study, the investigators assessed the efficacy and safety of the biosimilar Razumab compared with innovator ranibizumab in the treatment of mCNVM. This retrospective, multicenter study enrolled treatment-naïve patients with mCNVM between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients received intravitreal injections of either innovator or biosimilar ranibizumab, following a pro re nata (PRN) protocol. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were 18 years of age or older, had an axial length greater than 26.5 mm or a spherical equivalent to or greater than –6.00 D, had a diagnosis confirmed by multimodal imaging, and a minimum 12-month follow-up.1
The assessed outcomes included change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; ETDRS letters), central macular thickness (CMT), intraocular pressure (IOP), injection frequency, and safety profile.1
For this study, a total of 80 eyes were analyzed and sorted into either group A, in which everyone received the innovator (n = 38), or group B, in which everyone received the biosimilar (n = 42). At the 12-month point, the mean BCVA was observed to improve from 51.0 ± 16.5 to 64.5 ± 5.5 ETDRS letters in the innovator group and from 52.5 ± 16.5 to 64.5 ± 4.5 in the biosimilar group (p > .05). Additionally, CMT reduced significantly in both the innovator (332.03 ± 39.22 µm to 268.32 ± 18.78 µm) and biosimilar (315.03 ± 44.20 µm to 271.12 ± 20.39 µm) groups (p > .05). The mean number of injections was about 2.68 ± 0.51 and 2.71 ± 0.49 in the innovator and biosimilar groups, respectively. Generally, IOP remained stable in both cohorts, and no significant ocular or systemic adverse events were observed, reported the investigators.1
Although the study was considered to be robust due to its multicenter, real-world design, the authors wrote there were a few limitations. The study was retrospective, meaning that long-term complications—such as the progression of chorioretinal atrophy or recurrence patterns—could not be fully assessed because of the relatively short 12-month follow-up period. Additionally, the findings are specific to the mCNVM indication; therefore, the authors warned that extrapolation to other retinal diseases should only be performed when supported by indication-specific data.1
REFERENCES
1. Chakraborty D, Sinha TK, Sinha S, et al. Biosimilar Versus Innovator Ranibizumab in Myopic CNVM: Comparative Real-World Outcomes- The BRIM Study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2025:19:3741-3747. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S549744.
2. Perez D, Schwartz S, Loewenstein A. Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization. March 1, 2020. Accessed November 5, 2025. https://www.aao.org/eyenet/article/myopic-choroidal-neovascularization
Newsletter
Stay informed on drug updates, treatment guidelines, and pharmacy practice trends—subscribe to Pharmacy Times for weekly clinical insights.














































































































































































































