Depemokimab plasma concentrations were summarized, and blood eosinophil counts were log transformed, with ratio to baseline being analyzed. The results from these studies were presented in a late-breaking oral abstract session at the 2025 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI)/World Allergy Organization (WAO) Joint Congress in San Diego, California.1,2
About the Trials
- Trial Name: Efficacy and Safety of Depemokimab (GSK3511294) in Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (ANCHOR-1)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05274750
- Completion Date: August 27, 2024
- Trial Name: Efficacy and Safety of Depemokimab (GSK3511294) in Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (ANCHOR-2) (ANCHOR-2)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05281523
- Completion Date: August 6, 2024
The analyses included a total of 272 patients. At the first assessment 4 weeks post-administration, the mean concentration of depemokimab was about 10.65 μg/mL. Additionally, concentrations were at their lowest at weeks 26 (pre-dose; 1.02 [0.408] μg/mL) and 52 (1.25 [0.719] μg/mL). Baseline geometric means blood eosinophil counts were 344 cells/μL and 322 cells/μL for depemokimab and placebo, respectively. At week 4, the blood eosinophil count ratio to baseline for depemokimab was about 0.104 (95% CI: 0.091, 0.118; p < .001). Further, relative reductions were sustained throughout both dosing intervals (week 26: 0.168 [95% CI: 0.148,0.191], p < .001; week 52: 0.153 [95% CI: 0.133,0.176], p < .001). These findings were consistent across both ANCHOR trials.1,3,4
Further, by week 52 in the pooled ANCHOR studies, about 74% (n = 200) of patients in the depemokimab arm and 64% (n = 164) patients in the placebo arm did not have intervention with standard of care, surgery, or disease-modulating medication (OR: 0.58 [95% CI: 0.40, 0.86], nominal p = .006). The results still trended in depemokimab’s favor even after considering intervention with surgery or disease-modulating medication alone, with about 88% (n = 239) of depemokimab-treated patients not having surgery or disease-modulating medication compared with 83% (n = 213) in the placebo group (HR: 0.713 [95% CI: 0.453, 1.124], p = .146).2
“[These] data build on the body of evidence supporting depemokimab as an ultra-long-acting treatment and demonstrate significant reductions in nasal polyps with a twice-yearly dosing regimen. With nearly 40% of patients needing repeat surgeries and many requiring long-term systemic corticosteroids, there is a clear medical need for alternative treatment options to provide sustained symptom improvement and help alleviate the debilitating burden of this disease,” Kaivan Khavandi, SVP and global head, respiratory, immunology/inflammation R&D, said in a news release.2
REFERENCES
1. Desrosiers M, Schalkwijk S, Edwards D, Follows R, Han J. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Twice-Yearly Depemokimab in the Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Parallel Phase III ANCHOR-1/2 Trials. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2025;155(2, Supplement):AB455. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2024.12.1054
3. Efficacy and Safety of Depemokimab (GSK3511294) in Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (ANCHOR-1). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05274750. Updated March 12, 2025. Accessed March 19, 2025. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05274750
4. Efficacy and Safety of Depemokimab (GSK3511294) in Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (ANCHOR-2) (ANCHOR-2). ClincialTrials.gov identifier: NCT05281523. Updated January 16, 2025. Accessed March 19, 2025. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05281523