Commentary
Article
Author(s):
Reduced-dose apixaban maintains efficacy with less bleeding for extended CAT prophylaxis, reinforcing NCCN’s pre-existing guidance in intermediate to high-risk cancer patients.
Patients with cancer are predisposed to recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) because malignancy creates a hypercoagulable state, 1 of the 3 components of Virchow’s triad (Figure 1).1 The consideration for VTE prophylaxis in malignancy should be guided by an individualized assessment of both thrombosis risk and major bleeding risk, weighing potential benefits against harms.2
For recurrent cancer-associated VTE (CAT), the American Society of Hematology (ASH), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) clinical practice guidelines recommend either a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH).2-4 Guideline-supported DOACs include apixaban (Eliquis; Bristol Myers Squibb), rivaroxaban (Xarelto; Johnson & Johnson), and edoxaban (Savaysa; Daiichi-Sankyo), all of which directly inhibit factor Xa, preventing fibrin clot formation.2-5
Anticoagulation is generally continued for at least 6 months and can be continued for as long as the cancer remains active or the patient is receiving anticancer treatment.2-4 Additionally, the NCCN guidelines recommend reduced-dose DOACs, such as apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily, in ambulatory patients with cancer with intermediate-to-high risk for VTE determined by a Khorana score of 2 or greater (Table 13,7).3 This recommendation is based on findings from the Apixaban for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in the High-Risk Ambulatory Cancer Patients (AVERT) trial.6
In the double-blind, randomized, noninferiority API-CAT trial, 866 patients were assigned to receive apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily (reduced dose), and 900 patients were assigned to receive apixaban 5 mg twice daily (full dose). Eligible participants had active cancer with a history of VTE, had completed at least 6 months of anticoagulation for CAT, and continued treatment for an additional 12 months as secondary prophylaxis.8
The primary objective was to determine whether reduced-dose apixaban was noninferior to the full dose for preventing recurrent CAT. Patients in the reduced-dose apixaban group had a 24% lower risk of the primary outcome and a 25% lower risk of clinically relevant bleeding compared with full-dose apixaban. However, mortality rates were similar between both groups.8
These results support the use of reduced-dose apixaban for extended prophylaxis in patients with active cancer, a recommendation already included in the NCCN guidelines prior to this trial.8
The key takeaway is that clinicians can maintain efficacy while reducing bleeding risk by stepping down to reduced-dose apixaban after 6 months of initial therapy, potentially improving patient comfort and adherence. As always, anticoagulation decisions in cancer care should be individualized through ongoing discussion of risks, benefits, and patient preferences.
Stay informed on drug updates, treatment guidelines, and pharmacy practice trends—subscribe to Pharmacy Times for weekly clinical insights.