More than 38 million people have been diagnosed with diabetes as of 2021.1 Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is classified by autoimmune beta-cell destruction, causing insulin deficiency, whereas type 2 diabetes (T2D) is non-autoimmune in nature and is caused by a progressive loss of beta-cell function, leading to decreased insulin secretion, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome. Regardless of classification, tight control of diabetes is essential for preventing both micro and macrovascular complications. The American Diabetes Association Standards of Care in Diabetes has taken this prevention one step further, shifting focus to protection of these complications by revising recommended pharmacologic treatments.2 In particular, obesity, cardiovascular (CV) disease, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) have dedicated content sections to reflect evidence in medications shown to not only address blood glucose control, but these comorbid conditions.3-5
As obesity has been linked to an increased risk of T2D development, weight management is imperative. Guidelines address appropriate weight monitoring, provision of individualized nutrition and exercise counseling, and recommendations for glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs).3 Table 16-9 reviews recommended GLP-1 RAs and their respective outcomes. Prior to initiation of a GLP-1 RA, medical history should be reviewed for presence of medullary thyroid carcinoma and/or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2 as GLP-1 RAs are contraindicated with these disease states.2 Patients should be counseled on major adverse effects (AEs), including appetite suppression, weight loss, risk of pancreatitis, and gastrointestinal AEs such as nausea and vomiting. Such risks can be mitigated by eating smaller meals, limiting carbohydrate-heavy foods, and ensuring appropriate dose titrations at 4-week intervals.
Atherosclerotic CV disease is the primary cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes.4 Appropriate blood pressure monitoring and control, diet and exercise recommendations, and treatment options with proven CV benefit form the backbone of treatment. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and GLP-1 RAs are recommended first line for reduction of CV risk, often with both therapies being appropriate in combination. Tables 2a7-13 and 2b14,15 summarize the CV data supporting the use of these agents. Patients should be counseled on potential AEs of SGLT2i, such as urinary tract infections or yeast infections, which can be mitigated with appropriate hydration and hygiene.2
CKD is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease and occurs in up to 40% of patients with diabetes.5 Guidelines recommend annual screening, frequent monitoring, and appropriate pharmacologic prevention with an SGLT2i following optimization of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker therapy. Specifically, SGLT2i are recommended if a patient’s estimated glomerular filtration rate is greater than or equal to 20 mL/min/1.73 m2. GLP-1 RAs may also have a role in reducing CKD risk and are included in guideline recommendations (see Table 37-9,11-13,16-18).5
Pharmacist Management Model and Role
Collaborative Drug Therapy Management or Collaborative Practice Agreements
Given the complexity of and challenges associated with diabetes care, an interdisciplinary approach is ideal. Diverse strategies exist in integrating collective efforts to manage patients with diabetes. Collaborative drug therapy management (CDTM) and collaborative practice agreements (CPAs) are 2 frameworks that allow pharmacists to provide expanded patient care services, particularly in managing chronic conditions such as diabetes.
CDTMs are more focused, specifically authorizing pharmacists to manage and modify drug therapy, including initiating, adjusting, or discontinuing medications for diabetes. A CDTM for diabetes management would primarily involve a pharmacist adjusting insulin doses, modifying oral diabetes medications, and ordering related laboratory tests. Alternatively, CPAs are broader agreements that can encompass a wider range of clinical services beyond medication management, such as ordering laboratory tests, performing physical assessments, and providing comprehensive diabetes education and care planning. A CPA might include these medication-related activities but also allow the pharmacist to perform foot examinations, provide detailed lifestyle counseling, make referrals to specialists, and take a more comprehensive approach to the patient's diabetes care. The choice between CDTM and CPA often depends on state regulations, practice setting capabilities, and the desired scope of pharmacist services.19
To effectively implement a CDTM or CPA, several key practices are essential. It is important to create a protocol that clearly outlines the scope of services and helps guide clinical decision-making. Establishing standardized documentation templates ensures consistency in care delivery and supports quality assurance efforts. Lastly, identifying a set of quality metrics that capture clinical outcomes, such as change in hemoglobin A1c, can demonstrate the program's value.