News
Article
Author(s):
Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy shows improved survival in HR+, HER2- breast cancer, but its cost-effectiveness raises concerns in the US market.
In the randomized, open-label, multicenter phase 3 NATALEE clinical trial (NCT05306340), ribociclib (Kisqali; Novartis) plus endocrine therapy, a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI), significantly improved invasive disease-free survival among individuals with HR-positive (HR+) and HER2-negative (HER2-) early breast cancer. However, findings presented at the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Chicago, Illinois, aimed to further assess the cost-effectiveness of ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in this patient population in the US.1,2
Image credit: Crystal light | stock.adobe.com
HR+, HER2- breast cancer is the most common form of breast cancer, with a 5-year survival rate of about 99% when the tumor is localized to the breast. However, for cancer that has already spread to the distant part of the body, the median survival is generally 5 years. Following, HR+, HER2- early breast cancer is a common subtype where the cancer cells have estrogen and progesterone receptors but do not have excessive amounts of the HER2 protein, according to Mayo Clinic.3
Ribociclib is a targeted cancer drug that works by blocking a protein that signals cancer cells to divide, ultimately slowing or stopping the spread of the cells. Previous research has demonstrated significant improvement in overall survival among individuals with breast cancer that is HR+, HER2- that were treated with ribociclib. Additionally, when combined with NSAI, ribociclib has been shown to improve invasive disease-free survival in individuals with HR+, HER2- early breast cancer at stage 2 or 3.4
Using data from the phase 3 NATALEE clinical trial, the researchers developed a partitioned survival model that evaluated the cost-effectiveness of ribociclib combined with endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone among individuals with HR+, HER2- early breast cancer. The model included individuals with a median age of 51 years and extended survival curves to a 10-year horizon using standard extrapolation techniques. The study authors noted that costs were determined using data from the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, while effectiveness was measured in both quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and equal value life years (evLYs), informed by age-, sex-, and breast cancer-specific utility values. The primary end point of the study included the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) expressed in USD per evLY.1
The results from the base-case analysis demonstrated ribociclib plus endocrine therapy experienced discounted costs of about $442,000 and yielded 7.79 discounted evLYs, whereas endocrine therapy alone accumulated discounted costs of $186,000 and resulted in 7.57 discounted evLYs. Regarding the primary end point, the results displayed an ICER of $1.2 million per evLY for adding ribociclib. Further results from the deterministic sensitivity analysis indicated that the model's conclusions were only sensitive to the price of ribociclib, with no other factor influencing the outcome. Lastly, the threshold analysis revealed that a 90% reduction in ribociclib's price would be required for the combination therapy to be cost-effective, even at the highest willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold.1
The findings suggest that at current pricing, ribociclib with endocrine therapy is not expected to be a cost-effective strategy compared to endocrine therapy alone for patients with HR+, HER2- early breast cancer in the US.1
Stay informed on drug updates, treatment guidelines, and pharmacy practice trends—subscribe to Pharmacy Times for weekly clinical insights.