A clinical trial comparing stents found that the CYPHER Sirolimus-eluting Coronary Stent had a clinical benefit similar to that of a bare metal stent (BMS), with no differences in incidence of heart attack, death, or blood clots. Data from this new trial support data from a previous trial touting CYPHER?s benefits. In fact, this trial showed that patients in the CYPHER group had significantly lower rates of target vessel failure at the 5-year follow-up than patients in the BMS group (22.5% vs 34.7%). At the long-term follow-up, the CYPHER stent also resulted in lower rates of re-treatment, myocardial infarction, and death, when compared with BMS (9.4% vs 24.2%).
Ms. Farley is a freelance medical writer based in Wakefield, RI.
In Seniors: Consider CMV Serostatus
When Recommending Flu Vaccine
Older people who have cytomegalovirus seem to have less robust responses to the trivalent influenza vaccine than those who do not have CMV.
News from the year's biggest meetings
Clinical features with downloadable PDFs