The 411 on Biohacking Supplements

DECEMBER 12, 2017
Supplements are not a completely foreign topic for most pharmacists. After all, most of our education and training has addressed some form of nutrition and vitamin supplementation. Although the focus in the past has been on supplements that have no active ingredients based on laboratory assessment, a new area has been in the news recently.
 
This new type of supplement coming to market is called nootropics, which mainly aims to improve the cognitive abilities of those who take them, using a mixture of natural ingredients and synthetic chemicals that some research has indicated may be beneficial in some form. These products are supposed to "biohack" the brain to improve focus and mental clarity, boost one's mood, and serve as "mind fuel." They are aimed at those seeking to be productive beyond what they get from a cup of coffee. Nootropics has taken off in many technology start-up circles as a tool to combat fatigue and work better than competitors. 

Though this sounds intriguing, these products are not regulated by the FDA because they market themselves as nutritional supplements, thus avoiding oversight. There is no real clinical evidence from a prospective trial demonstrating that the products work. Most of the research listed on websites that sell nootropics list decades-old studies or ones where the products were tested only in animals.

Recently, CNBC.com reported that one of the products, when compared with caffeine in a prospective randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial, had no real effect and that caffeine actually performed better when measuring verbal memory recall scores.1,2 In a blog post responding to CNBC.com's coverage, the company claimed that the study results were not scientific enough and therefore not reflective of the product's true potential.3
 
So, will pharmacy shelves start stocking these products? Possibly, especially if someone can demonstrate clinical data to back up the companies' claims.

What is most interesting is the possible drug interactions or disease concerns that these products carry. Most of the systems that pharmacists use to check for interaction do not carry the ingredients in these products in their databases, so we are in the dark right now. Pharmacists should keep nootropics on their radar.

References

1. Farr C. This start-up raised millions to sell 'brain hacking' pills, but its own study found coffee works better. CNBC.com. cnbc.com/2017/11/30/hvmn-nootrobox-study-smart-pill-less-effective-than-caffeine.html. Published November 30, 2017. Accessed December 11, 2017.
2. ClinicalTrials.gov. The effects of SPRINT, a combination of natural ingredients, on cognition in healthy young volunteers. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02857829?term=SPRINT+nootropic&rank=1. Accessed December 11, 2017.
3. Woo G, Brandt M. "In response to CNBC’s 'This start-up raised millions to sell 'brain hacking' pills ... '" HVMN blog post. hvmn.com/blog/in-response-to-cnbc. Accessed December 11, 2017.
 


Timothy Aungst, PharmD
Timothy Aungst, PharmD
Timothy Dy Aungst, PharmD, is an assistant professor of pharmacy practice at MCPHS University. He graduated from Wilkes University Nesbitt School of Pharmacy and completed a PGY-1 Pharmacy Practice Residency at St. Luke's University Hospital, and then a Clinical Geriatric Fellowship at MCPHS University. He is passionate about the rise of technology in health care and its application to pharmacy. He has published primarily on the role of mobile technology and mHealth, and made multiple national and international presentations on those topics. He blogs at TheDigitalApothecary.com, and you can find him on Twitter @TDAungst.
SHARE THIS SHARE THIS
0
Pharmacy Times Strategic Alliance
 

Pharmacist Education
Clinical features with downloadable PDFs

SIGN UP FOR THE PHARMACY TIMES NEWSLETTER
Personalize the information you receive by selecting targeted content and special offers.