Despite error-prevention efforts, confusing drug names and lookalike packaging continue to be common sources of medication errors. Selecting the best error-prevention strategies is not an easy task. Even when system-based causes have been identified, it may be unclear which error-prevention strategies will be most effective.
Listed below are examples of error-prevention strategies in order of effectiveness for creating lasting system changes for safe medication use. Those listed first are more powerful because they focus on changes to the system in which individuals operate. As the list descends, strategies that target system changes but rely in some part on human vigilance and memory are presented.
Fail-safes and constraints are among the most powerful and effective error-prevention strategies. They involve true system changes in the design of products or how individuals interact within the system. Examples outside of health care include the inability to start a car while the gearshift is in reverse or using fingerprint verification to enter a building or computer system. At a community pharmacy where the pharmacy is integrated with the cash register, a fail-safe would prevent the clerk from ringing up the prescription unless final verification by a pharmacist was noted in the system.
Forcing functions are procedures that create a "hard stop" during a process to help ensure that important information is provided before proceedingoften referred to as a "lock and key" design. Examples include a pharmacy computer system that prevents overriding selected high-alert messages without a notation (eg, entry of the patient-specific indication for selected error-prone medications), or a bar-code scanning system that does not allow final verification of a product without a positive match between the selected product and the profiled medication.
Automation and computerization of medication-use processes and tasks can limit reliance on memory. Examples include pharmacy computer systems that can receive prescriptions sent electronically from a prescriber's handheld device or computer and thus eliminate transcriptions and misinterpretations; robotic prescription preparation and dispensing technology; and computer systems that provide accurate warnings related to allergies, significant drug interactions, and excessive doses.
Standardization creates a uniform model to adhere to when performing various functions, and it tends to reduce the complexity and variation of a specific process. For example, standardized processes could be created to guide the pharmacist's final verification of a medication. On its own, standardization relies on human vigilance to ensure that a process is followed; therefore, it is less effective than the strategies mentioned previously.
Redundancies incorporate duplicate steps or add another individual to a process to force additional checks in the system. Involving 2 individuals in a process reduces the likelihood that both will make the same error with the same medication for the same patient. The potential for error still exists, however, because the redundant step may be omitted or ignored. Examples of redundancies include the use of both brand and generic names when communicating medication information or requiring independent double-checks of high-alert medications before dispensing. Patient counseling is often an underutilized redundancy that can detect many errors.
Reminders and checklists help make important information readily available. Examples include using auxiliary labels to distinguish products; building look-and sound-alike alerts into order-entry systems; and using preprinted prescription blanks that include prompts for important information (eg, medication indication, allergies, patient birth date).
Rules and policies are necessary in organizations. Effective rules and policies guide staff toward an intended positive outcome. Some may add unnecessary complexity and may be met with resistance, however, even rightfully so, especially when implemented in response to an error. Because their use relies on memory, they should be used as a foundation to support more effective strategies that target system issues.
Education and information are important tactics when combined with other strategies that strengthen the medication-use system. The effectiveness of these tactics relies on an individual's ability to remember what has been presented. Thus, on their own, they offer little leverage to prevent errors.
When implementing error-prevention strategies in your organization, each of these examples is important to consider. While strategies at the bottom of the list may be used initially, we must realize that they will not be effective for long-lasting error prevention when used alone. In order to do a better job at preventing medication errors, we need to employ a variety of strategies that focus on system and human factor issues. Because people cannot be expected to compensate for weak systems, routinely evaluate the error-prevention strategies being used in your organization. Consider whether more powerful strategies exist that could be implemented to enhance medication safety.
Dr. Gaunt is a medication safety analyst and the editor of ISMP Medication Safety Alert! Community/Ambulatory Care Edition.
In Seniors: Consider CMV Serostatus
When Recommending Flu Vaccine
Older people who have cytomegalovirus seem to have less robust responses to the trivalent influenza vaccine than those who do not have CMV.
News from the year's biggest meetings
Clinical features with downloadable PDFs