Researchers Encourage More Chlamydia Screening

Published Online: Saturday, January 1, 2005

The reasons for more thorough chlamydia screening are 2-fold. A study, reported in the Annals of Internal Medicine (October 5, 2004), found that more comprehensive screening would likely reduce the frequency of the disease and be cost-effective.

In the study, the researchers found that screening women under the age of 30, and suggesting that any woman who had chlamydia be tested every 6 months rather than only once after diagnosis, would raise health care costs by $107 per woman but would prove cost-effective down the line. "When you take into account the positive effects of screening—not only for the women themselves, but also the benefits from avoiding transmission of the disease to babies or to men—screening becomes cost-saving," said Delphine Hu, MD, PhD, study author.

Dr. Hu explained that the reason for testing relatively older women for the disease reflects current trends: women are marrying later in life and thus have a longer period of sex partners, which increases their risk for chlamydia. Also, screening women every 6 months after they have had chlamydia is wise because those who have had it are 2 times as likely to have a recurrence, compared with those who have never had the disease.

Latest Articles
In case you got caught up in the Thanksgiving holiday rush, here are the top trending stories you may have missed in November:
Bryan Ziegler, PharmD, executive director of Kennedy Pharmacy Innovation Center, provides some resources for community pharmacists to use when implementing new collaborative services with primary care providers.
James Schiffer, RPh, associate at Allegaert Berger & Vogel LLC, discusses some tips for pharmacists who are facing a Drug Enforcement Administration audit.
Carlos Aquino, founder and president of PharmaDiversion LLC, talks about the importance of the Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA) diversion website.
Latest Issues