Protease Inhibitors and PPIs

Author: John R. Horn, PharmD, FCCP, and Philip D. Hansten, PharmD

Drs. Horn and Hansten are both professors of pharmacy at the University of Washington School of Pharmacy. For an electronic version of this article, including references if any, visit www.hanstenandhorn.com.


Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most potent inhibitors of gastric acid secretion currently available. They have become the treatment of choice for acid-related upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and diseases. In addition to the classical indications for PPI therapy, some drug regimens produce a high incidence of GI side effects. For example, in a survey of HIV patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy, a majority reported using some sort of acid suppressive therapy including antacids, histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), and PPIs for heartburn and gastroesophageal reflux disease.1 Thus, the potential for drug interactions between antiretroviral drugs and acid suppressive therapy is large. In this review, we will focus on the interactions between protease inhibitors and PPIs.

Effect of PPIs on Plasma Concentrations of Protease Inhibitors

Protease Inhibitor

Mean Change in AUC (%)

Atazanavir (Reyataz)

Decrease 76-98

Darunavir (Prezista)

Increase 4

Fosamprenavir (Lexiva)

Decrease 2-9

Indinavir (Crixivan)

Decrease 10-50

Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Kaletra)

None

Nelfinavir (Viracept)

Decrease 36

Ritonavir (Norvir)

Decrease 0-17

Saquinavir/Ritonavir (Fortovase)

Increase 54-82

Tipranavir (Aptivus)

None

AUC = area under the plasma concentration-time curve;
PPIs = proton pump inhibitors.

Atazanavir appears to be most sensitive to pH changes caused by PPIs. Studies have noted marked reductions in atazanavir area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) when it is administered with PPIs including omeprazole and lansoprazole.2-4 Atazanavir minimum plasma concentrations in patients treated with PPIs have been reported to be unaffected by concomitant PPI use.5 The differences in these reports may be due to different subject types, PPI doses, and small sample sizes. Pending further data, PPIs should be avoided in patients taking atazanavir.

Fosamprenavir is a prodrug for amprenavir. Its solubility is reduced when the pH exceeds 3.3. One might expect PPIs would reduce its absorption. Studies where fosamprenavir is administered simultaneously with esomeprazole, however, did not detect a significant reduction in amprenavir plasma concentrations. It may be that administering the fosamprenavir at the nadir of the PPI's acid-suppressing action limits the potential effect. It is common for the gastric pH to drop below 3 during the morning before the effects of the PPI are maximized. It is noteworthy that H2RAs produce a greater (30%) reduction in amprenavir concentrations, perhaps due to their more rapid effect on gastric pH after dosing. PPIs may produce a larger effect on fosamprenavir's absorption under different dosing conditions.

Omeprazole has been reported to reduce the plasma concentration of indinavir by up to 50%.6,7 Increasing the dose of omeprazole from 20 to 40 mg daily increased the magnitude of the reduction.7 Nelfinavir appears to be affected to a slightly lesser extent.8

Whereas darunavir, lopinavir, ritonavir, and tipranavir appear to be minimally affected by PPI administration, the plasma concentration of saquinavir has been noted to increase significantly during concurrent PPI dosing.9,10 The administration of omeprazole 2 hours prior to the saquinavir dose produced a similar increase in the AUC (67% vs 54%), compared with simultaneous administration.10

It appears that the effects of PPIs on protease inhibitors (both decreased and increased plasma concentrations) are based on changes in gastric pH. The effects of H2RAs typically mirror the changes noted with PPIs. Unfortunately, many of the studies did not measure gastric pH or control for differences in PPI metabolism due to CYP2C19 genotype. The clinical significance of the reported changes in protease inhibitor plasma concentrations remains to be defined. Reduced efficacy or the development of resistant strains of HIV may result from lowered plasma concentrations.

Due to the limited number of published studies often involving small numbers of healthy subjects, the mean changes in protease inhibitor concentration should be used only as a rough estimate of the magnitude of effect in a specific patient. It is probable that PPIinduced changes in protease inhibitor AUC will vary by specific PPI, its dosage regimen, pharmacogenetics, and a patient's underlying diseases. Patients taking protease inhibitors should be counseled regarding the use of acidreducing drugs, including those available over the counter. If acid-reducing drugs are used, patients should be monitored for changes in their response to antiviral therapy.

References

  1. Luber A, Garg V, Gharakhanian S, Vertex HIV Program Team. Survey of medication used by HIV-infected patients that affected gastrointestinal (GI) acidity and potential for negative drug interactions with HAART. 7th International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection. Glasgow, UK; 2004 [abstract P294].
  2. Agarwala S, Gray K, Eley T, Wang Y, Hughes E, Grasela D. Pharmacokinetic interaction between atazanavir and omeprazole in healthy subjects. 3rd International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 2005 [abstract WePe3.3C08].
  3. Agarwala S, Gray K, Wang Y, Grasela D. Pharmacokinetic effect of omeprazole on atazanavir co-administered with ritonavir in healthy subjects. 12th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. Boston, MA; 2005 [abstract no. 658].
  4. Tomilo DL, Smith PF, Ogundele AB, et al. Inhibition of atazanavir oral absorption by lansoprazole gastric acid suppression in healthy volunteers. Pharmacotherapy. 2006;26:341-346.
  5. Guiard-Schmid JB, Poirier JM, Bonnard P, et al. Proton pump inhibitors do not reduce atazanavir concentrations in HIV-infected patients treated with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir [letter]. AIDS. 2005;19(16):1937-1938.
  6. Burger DM, Hugen PW, Kroon FP, et al. Pharmacokinetic interaction between the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole and the HIV protease inhibitor indinavir. AIDS. 1998;12(15):2080-2082.
  7. Tappouni HL, Rublein JC, Donovan BJ, et al. Effect of omeprazole on the plasma concentrations of indinavir when administered alone and in combination with ritonavir. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65(5):422-428.
  8. Fang AF, Bharat DD, LaBadie RR, Crownover PH, Hewlett D, Glue PW. Significant decrease in nelfinavir systemic exposure after omeprazole coadministration in healthy subjects. Pharmacotherapy. 2008;28(1):42-50.
  9. Winston A, Back D, Fletcher C, et al. Effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir-500 mg formulation with ritonavir in healthy male and female volunteers. AIDS. 2006;20(10):1401-1406.
  10. Singh K, Dickinson L, Chaikan A, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of saquinavir/ritonavir and omeprazole in HIV-infected subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;83(6):867-872.