Prasugrel or Clopidogrel in ACS: A Head-to-Head Study

Jeannette Y. Wick, RPh, MBA, FASCP
Published Online: Monday, June 30, 2014
Follow Pharmacy_Times:
A recent study examines the comparative efficacy of prasugrel and clopidogrel in the treatment of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a killer—it’s the leading cause of death in the United States. Patients who experience ACS are whisked into the cardiac catheterization lab to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). After PCI, dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor) is the standard of care to prevent thrombotic complications. A retrospective, observational, pilot study published ahead of print in the American Journal of Therapeutics examines the comparative efficacy of prasugrel, the drug previously identified as most effective in a landmark study, and clopidogrel at a loading dose higher than that employed in said study.

The newer study enrolled patients with ACS who underwent PCI and received a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel or a 60-mg loading dose of prasugrel followed by daily maintenance doses of 75 mg and 10 mg, respectively, for 2 years. The study period was between July 1, 2009, and June 30, 2011, and 221 patients participated.

Loading doses of clopidogrel and prasugrel are often given to achieve maximal platelet inhibition quickly (although prasugrel’s onset of action is faster than clopidogrel’s). A higher loading dose of clopidogrel (600 mg in this study vs 300 mg in a previous study) was used because this drug has a slow onset of action requiring activation by P450 isoenzymes. A higher clopidogrel loading dose (600 mg) has also been associated with lower rates of ischemic complication and death.

The primary efficacy end point was composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke occurring through 1 year. When patients died during the study, investigators attempted to identify cause of death using medical records or death certificates.

Primary efficacy end point was similar in the 2 treatment groups, as were bleeding events. The previous study had identified higher rates of adverse events with prasugrel, and this study did not replicate those findings.

The authors conclude that prasugrel is at least as effective and safe as clopidogrel in patients with ACS undergoing early invasive management.
Related Articles
Many regulatory and professional organizations monitor hospitals for compliance to treatment guidelines, equating the use of evidence-based processes to high-quality care.
Antithrombotic therapy is an essential element of treatment after patients experience acute coronary syndrome. Fortunately, prescribers can draw from a considerably larger selection of antithrombotics than ever before, as prasugrel, ticagrelor, fondaparinux, and bivalirudin have joined warfarin, unfractionated heparin, and the low molecular weight heparins in evidence-based guidelines.
A Merck study found patients who received a cholesterol-lowering combination of ezetimibe/simvastatin experienced fewer major cardiovascular events than those taking simvastatin alone.
A new study presented today at American Heart Association’s Scientific Sessions suggests clinicians may have more evidenced-based options when considering preventative therapy for high-risk acute coronary syndrome patients.
Latest Issues
  • photo
    Pharmacy Times
    Health-System Edition
    Directions in Pharmacy
    OTC Guide
    Generic Supplements
  • photo
    Pharmacy Careers
    Specialty Pharmacy Times