Statement from Ralph G. Neas, President and CEO of the Generic Pharmaceutical Association on the Mutual v. Bartlett Supreme Court Ruling

Published Online: Monday, June 24, 2013
Follow Pharmacy_Times:
PRESS RELEASE

WASHINGTON, DC (June 24, 2013) — “Today’s Supreme Court ruling on the Mutual v. Bartlett case upholds a key principle: decisions about the safety and efficacy of prescription drugs should rest with scientific experts at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

When it comes to decisions on safety and approval of prescription medicine, the FDA is best equipped to make judgments that affect patients. The experts at FDA alone have the scientific knowledge, regulatory experience, and complete data to make these decisions.

The FDA’s job is to evaluate drugs on the science and make decisions that balance safety and risk with the need for access to life-saving medicines. Millions of patients rely on drugs like sulindac, which has been on the market for more than 30 years. It was prescribed and dispensed more than 300 million times between 2007-2012 with a typical safety profile. Decisions with this much at stake belong in the hands of the scientific, public health and regulatory experts at the FDA.

Related Articles
Generics saved $239 billion in 2013 (a 14% increase in savings from 2012) and more than $1.46 trillion over the recent decade. Further, the Express Scripts 2013 Drug Trend Report issued in 2014 shows that since 2008, the price of brand drugs has almost doubled, but the price of generic drugs has been cut roughly in half.
Latest Issues
$auto_registration$